fasterthanlight�
05-13 03:45 PM
Thats a nice stamp, welcome to the forums!
wallpaper Target Marketing Systems 3pc
ragz4u
01-24 04:11 PM
610-955-8290
phillyag
his email id is black_logs@yahoo.com
phillyag
his email id is black_logs@yahoo.com
sunny1000
02-01 03:32 PM
You need to have a labor application filed (need not be approved) 365 days before the expiry of the 6th year in order to get the 7th year extension.
MurthyDotCom : H1B Extensions Under the 21st Century DOJ Appropriations Act (http://www.murthy.com/news/UDh121st.html)
MurthyDotCom : H1B Extensions Under the 21st Century DOJ Appropriations Act (http://www.murthy.com/news/UDh121st.html)
2011 Off-target Marketing Strategy
woowjj2004
07-23 02:42 PM
Hello All,
I need some advice here. Actually I have filed two labors.
Company -A - EB3 - PD of March 2003
Company -B - EB2 - PD of March 2006 (PERM)
I got my Labor, I -140 from company B, and applied for 485 recently (July-2nd).
Recently (Last week) I got the labor approved from Company A (as it went to Backlog).
I was thinking that If I get I-140 from Company A then, My layer wants to use that Priority date in already filed 485 case.
But to get the I-140 from the Company B, I may have to spend around 3k, so just thinking if it is worth doing or not.
Any suggestions?
--
Deep
I need some advice here. Actually I have filed two labors.
Company -A - EB3 - PD of March 2003
Company -B - EB2 - PD of March 2006 (PERM)
I got my Labor, I -140 from company B, and applied for 485 recently (July-2nd).
Recently (Last week) I got the labor approved from Company A (as it went to Backlog).
I was thinking that If I get I-140 from Company A then, My layer wants to use that Priority date in already filed 485 case.
But to get the I-140 from the Company B, I may have to spend around 3k, so just thinking if it is worth doing or not.
Any suggestions?
--
Deep
more...
san_visa
06-07 12:09 PM
I just received the I-140 Receipt Notice and noticed that the section I am filed is not correct Sec.203(b)(1)(c) i.e multi-national Executive or Manger
where as I should have been filed for sec.203(b)(3)(A)(i) or (ii) Skilled Worker or Professionsal
I am going through Substitution process and the Previous I-140 was approved for sec.203(b)(3)(A)(i) or (ii) Skilled Worker or Professional
Now my question is what is the procedure to rectify this ? Also will I hold on to the processing dates {NOT Priority date} (say May 25th) for I-140 or should the lawyer file new appliaction which will push my I-140 petition dates to June?
Thanks,
San
where as I should have been filed for sec.203(b)(3)(A)(i) or (ii) Skilled Worker or Professionsal
I am going through Substitution process and the Previous I-140 was approved for sec.203(b)(3)(A)(i) or (ii) Skilled Worker or Professional
Now my question is what is the procedure to rectify this ? Also will I hold on to the processing dates {NOT Priority date} (say May 25th) for I-140 or should the lawyer file new appliaction which will push my I-140 petition dates to June?
Thanks,
San
sweet_jungle
07-12 12:59 PM
I will be filing my EAD renewal end of this month at NSC.
Is e-filing faster than paper filing? Any suggestions?
Also, my PD will become current from August.
Is e-filing faster than paper filing? Any suggestions?
Also, my PD will become current from August.
more...
.jpg "Target Marketing")
immm
07-18 03:35 PM
This is purely my opinion and may not be the best legal advice. If I were in the same situation, I would go by the EB type (EB2 first) and then by the priority dates. Whichever one is higher, I would apply both in that classification. If both I-140's are EB3 and same priority dates, I would go with the one with better job security (stable employer and job) and keep the other I-140 as backup. In this day and age of corporate acquisitions, mergers and bankruptcies and USCIS backlogs, you want to use the option with the least risk.
2010 with Targeted Online Marketing
Head2GC
09-12 07:29 PM
Hello,
I got my I-140 Approved (EB3 - Jan 2004) with Company A. Can i use the approval notice and get my H1B extended for 3 years from a different company ? Please advice as this will help me a lot.
Thanks in advance:confused::rolleyes:
- Head2GC
I got my I-140 Approved (EB3 - Jan 2004) with Company A. Can i use the approval notice and get my H1B extended for 3 years from a different company ? Please advice as this will help me a lot.
Thanks in advance:confused::rolleyes:
- Head2GC
more...
ingenix
09-12 10:04 AM
We also need to raise our voice for the Out of Status stuff.
Most of the consultants have one or more pay stub missing etc. There needs to be a amendment that more than 6 months so called out of status can also adjust their status by paying some fine or something because
1. Most of the employee are ignorant about this
2. and most employers take advantage of the situation and they are the ones who should be accountable and not the employees.
Most of the consultants have one or more pay stub missing etc. There needs to be a amendment that more than 6 months so called out of status can also adjust their status by paying some fine or something because
1. Most of the employee are ignorant about this
2. and most employers take advantage of the situation and they are the ones who should be accountable and not the employees.
hair Target Marketing
glosrfc
04-20 11:58 AM
I am...but most of you ain't, so I figured that it made more sense to use an image you'd be more familiar with.
Edit: Although I should point out that there's no image on the page...the statue is created entirely from the patterns and shading applied to the text.
Edit: Although I should point out that there's no image on the page...the statue is created entirely from the patterns and shading applied to the text.
more...
Macaca
11-13 06:04 PM
House Democrats Try Softening Their Tone; Lawmakers Seek Republican Votes Amid Veto Threats (http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB119491416890790655.html) By David Rogers | Wall Street Journal, Nov 13, 2007
WASHINGTON -- Down in the polls, House Democrats are showing a little more finesse as they try to move their legislative agenda around the wall of veto threats thrown up by President Bush.
Cute is out; conciliation is in. Late-night talks with Republican moderates intensified last week on the Democrats' signature health- care initiative -- extending coverage to millions of working class children. Staff negotiations continued during the holiday weekend, and Georgia Rep. Nathan Deal, a Democrat-turned-Republican with expertise on health and welfare issues, has been invited in by both sides as a broker.
House Appropriations Committee Chairman David Obey (D., Wis.) last week abandoned a confrontational plan to pair defense and education budgets, which would have dared the president to veto both. Instead the two bills were sent separately to Mr. Bush, who could veto the education measure as early as today. Looking ahead to the override vote, Mr. Obey took care to preserve House Republican provisions regarding abortion, child vaccines and abstinence education.
The House is scheduled Thursday to take up an antipredatory lending bill that is a showcase of cooperation between the chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, Rep. Barney Frank (D., Mass.) and his ranking Republican, Rep. Spencer Bachus of Alabama.
"He called up and said why don't you come down to my office and tell me what you need to be on the bill," said Rep. Steve LaTourette (R., Ohio) of his own dealings with the chairman. Mr. Frank is a close ally of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and has urged Democrats to permit more Republican amendments as a way to change the political tone in the House.
"It's transactional -- you have to see what it brings," Mr. Frank said. "But Hubert Humphrey once said, 'Whenever I get cute, I blow it.' That's the same thing I'm saying: if you try to be too political there's a backlash."
That backlash is evident: Congress's approval rating has fallen from 31% in March to 19% this month in the latest Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll.
A year after returning to power, House Democrats are at a crossroads. The party's early agenda -- tougher ethics rules, a minimum-wage increase and more aid for college students -- is largely in place. To go further, the majority must overcome not just presidential vetoes but the often-crippling partisan bitterness left from 12 years under Republican rule.
The war in Iraq, which permeates Washington and again divides the House this week, makes that cooperation harder. As the president lays down vetoes, he seems to prefer a divided Congress that poses less of a challenge. And the Senate's filibuster rules, which require a 60- vote supermajority just to get a bill to the White House, are an added frustration for House Democrats.
Allies of Ms. Pelosi said she could do more to take the lead and soften the tone in the House by using her power over the Rules Committee to allow more Republican amendments.
Last month's floor fight over the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act -- a controversial arena relating to the government's wiretapping activities -- is a case in point. The Rules panel disallowed all 27 Republican amendments. The minority retaliated with a procedural motion that successfully forced the bill to be withdrawn, and it still hasn't come back up for debate.
Ms. Pelosi's combative nature doesn't make such a shift easy. When the president recently accused Democrats of being led from the left by the anti-war group Code Pink, she saw it as a slight on her and responded in kind, saying Mr. Bush was acting less like "the president of the United States" than a "a junkyard dog on television every day because he has nothing to produce."
Going into 2008, the Californian said her party is well positioned on the issues most important to voters. Democrats think the child health-care fight is a long-term winner with bipartisan appeal. Party polls show her next priority, an energy bill that demands that cars be more fuel efficient, would appeal to independent voters. And tougher safety standards for imports from China is a third bipartisan issue that Democrats hope will improve Congress's image and is a reminder of Ms. Pelosi's early human-rights record on China.
"Nothing is a setback, we're going forward," she said, sitting in her Capitol office.
Ms. Pelosi's tough style borrows from her hero: the late Speaker Thomas "Tip" O'Neill of Massachusetts. Another Boston politician, and an O'Neill ally, Joseph Moakley, may be more relevant in Ms. Pelosi's predicament.
Mr. Moakley, a former chairman and long-time fixture in the House Rules Committee, lived by the maxim that he was in power to "say yes, not no."
"I always thought real power was the ability to say yes," Mr. Moakley said months before his death in 2001. "Because when I'd say yes, I found out they'd usually say yes back to me."
WASHINGTON -- Down in the polls, House Democrats are showing a little more finesse as they try to move their legislative agenda around the wall of veto threats thrown up by President Bush.
Cute is out; conciliation is in. Late-night talks with Republican moderates intensified last week on the Democrats' signature health- care initiative -- extending coverage to millions of working class children. Staff negotiations continued during the holiday weekend, and Georgia Rep. Nathan Deal, a Democrat-turned-Republican with expertise on health and welfare issues, has been invited in by both sides as a broker.
House Appropriations Committee Chairman David Obey (D., Wis.) last week abandoned a confrontational plan to pair defense and education budgets, which would have dared the president to veto both. Instead the two bills were sent separately to Mr. Bush, who could veto the education measure as early as today. Looking ahead to the override vote, Mr. Obey took care to preserve House Republican provisions regarding abortion, child vaccines and abstinence education.
The House is scheduled Thursday to take up an antipredatory lending bill that is a showcase of cooperation between the chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, Rep. Barney Frank (D., Mass.) and his ranking Republican, Rep. Spencer Bachus of Alabama.
"He called up and said why don't you come down to my office and tell me what you need to be on the bill," said Rep. Steve LaTourette (R., Ohio) of his own dealings with the chairman. Mr. Frank is a close ally of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and has urged Democrats to permit more Republican amendments as a way to change the political tone in the House.
"It's transactional -- you have to see what it brings," Mr. Frank said. "But Hubert Humphrey once said, 'Whenever I get cute, I blow it.' That's the same thing I'm saying: if you try to be too political there's a backlash."
That backlash is evident: Congress's approval rating has fallen from 31% in March to 19% this month in the latest Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll.
A year after returning to power, House Democrats are at a crossroads. The party's early agenda -- tougher ethics rules, a minimum-wage increase and more aid for college students -- is largely in place. To go further, the majority must overcome not just presidential vetoes but the often-crippling partisan bitterness left from 12 years under Republican rule.
The war in Iraq, which permeates Washington and again divides the House this week, makes that cooperation harder. As the president lays down vetoes, he seems to prefer a divided Congress that poses less of a challenge. And the Senate's filibuster rules, which require a 60- vote supermajority just to get a bill to the White House, are an added frustration for House Democrats.
Allies of Ms. Pelosi said she could do more to take the lead and soften the tone in the House by using her power over the Rules Committee to allow more Republican amendments.
Last month's floor fight over the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act -- a controversial arena relating to the government's wiretapping activities -- is a case in point. The Rules panel disallowed all 27 Republican amendments. The minority retaliated with a procedural motion that successfully forced the bill to be withdrawn, and it still hasn't come back up for debate.
Ms. Pelosi's combative nature doesn't make such a shift easy. When the president recently accused Democrats of being led from the left by the anti-war group Code Pink, she saw it as a slight on her and responded in kind, saying Mr. Bush was acting less like "the president of the United States" than a "a junkyard dog on television every day because he has nothing to produce."
Going into 2008, the Californian said her party is well positioned on the issues most important to voters. Democrats think the child health-care fight is a long-term winner with bipartisan appeal. Party polls show her next priority, an energy bill that demands that cars be more fuel efficient, would appeal to independent voters. And tougher safety standards for imports from China is a third bipartisan issue that Democrats hope will improve Congress's image and is a reminder of Ms. Pelosi's early human-rights record on China.
"Nothing is a setback, we're going forward," she said, sitting in her Capitol office.
Ms. Pelosi's tough style borrows from her hero: the late Speaker Thomas "Tip" O'Neill of Massachusetts. Another Boston politician, and an O'Neill ally, Joseph Moakley, may be more relevant in Ms. Pelosi's predicament.
Mr. Moakley, a former chairman and long-time fixture in the House Rules Committee, lived by the maxim that he was in power to "say yes, not no."
"I always thought real power was the ability to say yes," Mr. Moakley said months before his death in 2001. "Because when I'd say yes, I found out they'd usually say yes back to me."
hot Target Marketing Promotional
rkumar18
06-03 05:34 PM
Hi All,
I just called USCIS using the POJ method to check on my I485 status which is current for June (EB2 India PD is 3/20/04).
IO said a visa needs to be ordered for the file and it will be done in the next quarter i.e, July 08.She also said the file will not be assigned to the IO unless the visa is ordered??
Does this mean that all the visas for EB2 have been used for this quarter? Also, not sure why the file wont be worked on until the visa is ordered...which contradicts the pre-adjudication theory.
Thanks
I just called USCIS using the POJ method to check on my I485 status which is current for June (EB2 India PD is 3/20/04).
IO said a visa needs to be ordered for the file and it will be done in the next quarter i.e, July 08.She also said the file will not be assigned to the IO unless the visa is ordered??
Does this mean that all the visas for EB2 have been used for this quarter? Also, not sure why the file wont be worked on until the visa is ordered...which contradicts the pre-adjudication theory.
Thanks
more...
house Target Market graphs
tcsonly
03-15 07:10 PM
This question was already answered. Check other threads, especially "priority date transfers".
TCS.
TCS.
tattoo Target marketing made easy
gcspace
10-04 03:11 PM
My application reached 13 July at NSC nothing got back. Anyone in this boat?
There is a forum group "July3rd to July15th" , please add your name to the list and keep track of it. Yes, there are many people from July3rd to July16th who have not yet received anything.
There is a forum group "July3rd to July15th" , please add your name to the list and keep track of it. Yes, there are many people from July3rd to July16th who have not yet received anything.
more...
pictures Target Marketing
ItIsNotFunny
03-22 10:41 AM
What help do you need? To complain about this company to USCIS or to buy this company? :)
Let us not make these forums a place to discuss companies and job prospects.
In better words, let us keep IV limited to retrogression and immigration related issues only. There are other portals available where you can discuss all this.
Let us not make these forums a place to discuss companies and job prospects.
In better words, let us keep IV limited to retrogression and immigration related issues only. There are other portals available where you can discuss all this.
dresses target your market,
deecha
01-26 11:25 AM
Hi Gurus,
I was wondering if anyone on this site has ever filed an EB2-NIW I-140 petition ? And if so, what fields have you filed it in ? Do you necessarily need a masters degree or would 10+ years of experience in systems development qualify ?
I was also wondering if working in the health-care technology field, to create systems to diagnose and monitor cardiovascular systems to detect/prevent heart diseases would be something that could considered in the "national interest" ? If there is a job offer already extended to someone to work on such projects, would you still need a labor certification ?
Thank you in advance for taking the time out to read this and reply.
I was wondering if anyone on this site has ever filed an EB2-NIW I-140 petition ? And if so, what fields have you filed it in ? Do you necessarily need a masters degree or would 10+ years of experience in systems development qualify ?
I was also wondering if working in the health-care technology field, to create systems to diagnose and monitor cardiovascular systems to detect/prevent heart diseases would be something that could considered in the "national interest" ? If there is a job offer already extended to someone to work on such projects, would you still need a labor certification ?
Thank you in advance for taking the time out to read this and reply.
more...
makeup who your target market and
Puncher
November 9th, 2005, 04:52 PM
Often it is written on the lens (on the front), as part of the whole labeling there. Also the box/documentation of the lens should have that information. If you don't have that, you should be able to find that info on the Internet/manufacturer's homepage. Of course you could also try measuring, but you have to be relatively exact there.
From which lens do you want to know the thread size?
From which lens do you want to know the thread size?