ab3
04-14 01:52 PM
I have a question about filling out this section: PART 4, Processing Information. I am the employer and applying for a current H-1B holder (currently with another company) to transfer to my company AND extend his stay. He is currently here in the US.
Some people tell me I don't have to fill this section in, however the instructions say "if beneficiary...is outside the usa OR a requested extension of stay...cannot be granted, state US consulate or inspection facility you want notified".
What address should I put/consulate should I use (H-1B holder is from India).
Questions: 1) do i have to fill in all 1.a,b, c, and d?
2) does it matter if i check off consulate, pre-flight inspection, or port of entry?
3) if beneficiary doesn't have a fixed address in India anymore can I leave it blank?
Thank you for any help.
Some people tell me I don't have to fill this section in, however the instructions say "if beneficiary...is outside the usa OR a requested extension of stay...cannot be granted, state US consulate or inspection facility you want notified".
What address should I put/consulate should I use (H-1B holder is from India).
Questions: 1) do i have to fill in all 1.a,b, c, and d?
2) does it matter if i check off consulate, pre-flight inspection, or port of entry?
3) if beneficiary doesn't have a fixed address in India anymore can I leave it blank?
Thank you for any help.
wallpaper golden eagle flying above
reddymjm
09-07 06:36 PM
I am predicting EB3 move to June 2002 by end of Sep 2011
1st Qtr: 3/1/2010
2nd Qtr:4/9/2010
3rd Qtr: 5/6/2010
4th Qtr: 6/1/2010
Correct the year. HEre is mine in this fun game.
1st Qtr: 3/1/2002
2nd Qtr:4/9/2002
3rd Qtr: 5/6/2002
4th Qtr: 6/1/2003.
Dont ask me HOW? Wait and see..:D
1st Qtr: 3/1/2010
2nd Qtr:4/9/2010
3rd Qtr: 5/6/2010
4th Qtr: 6/1/2010
Correct the year. HEre is mine in this fun game.
1st Qtr: 3/1/2002
2nd Qtr:4/9/2002
3rd Qtr: 5/6/2002
4th Qtr: 6/1/2003.
Dont ask me HOW? Wait and see..:D
excogitator
07-19 02:30 AM
Thank you!! :)
2011 LIBERATION - golden eagle
inetuser
01-04 01:59 PM
I applied for 485 under july-07 bulletin and received my AP and EAD though I have not used it yet.
Now I got married and my wife is USC. I would like to apply for 485 based on marriage.
So before applying for marriage based 485, do I need to revoke employment based 485 application or I can have two 485 applications (from two different categories) at the same time? Do I need to revoke AP and EAD also received from employment based?
Also I assume that I need to maintain same A# (got from emploment based application) for marriage based 485 application also.
If I don't need to revoke employment based AP and EAD, then can I use these while my family based 485 application is pending?
I appreciate your help
Now I got married and my wife is USC. I would like to apply for 485 based on marriage.
So before applying for marriage based 485, do I need to revoke employment based 485 application or I can have two 485 applications (from two different categories) at the same time? Do I need to revoke AP and EAD also received from employment based?
Also I assume that I need to maintain same A# (got from emploment based application) for marriage based 485 application also.
If I don't need to revoke employment based AP and EAD, then can I use these while my family based 485 application is pending?
I appreciate your help
more...
greencardvow
07-31 04:53 PM
Yes you can. Go through this:
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=5132
A quick question..
Can I use a personal check for I 485 application? Is it the preferred way?
Thanks,
Sony
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=5132
A quick question..
Can I use a personal check for I 485 application? Is it the preferred way?
Thanks,
Sony
glus
07-24 08:20 AM
yes, your B1/B2 visa under normal circumstances is still valid.
more...
kirupa
11-02 09:42 PM
Added!
2010 Jack Oar with Golden Eagle
Macaca
07-07 08:36 AM
Bush Struggles With Pelosi and Reid (http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/B/BUSH_PELOSI_REID?SITE=AZTUC&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT) By BEN FELLER Associated Press Writer, Jul 7
Ben Feller covers the White House for The Associated Press.
WASHINGTON (AP) -- When President Bush invited lawmakers for a picnic, an approaching storm threatened to derail the event. His spokesman, Tony Snow, suggested that Democratic leaders in Congress secretly wanted it that way.
"They've been seeding the clouds," he said.
A little joke, a little suspicion. It seemed appropriate for Bush's relationship with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.
In public, there are promises to work together, then unmistakable acrimony. Private dealings are respectful, but not fully trustful.
Where ill will seeps out between Bush and the two Democratic leaders, it is not based on personal animus, those close to them say. Rather, it is rooted in vastly different views of how to run the country, and how much say each side has in running it.
Pelosi and Reid say Bush blithely dismisses their roles as leaders of a coequal branch of government; Bush says they overreach and meddle, never more so than in the case of the war in Iraq.
How well they get along, a fascination in Washington, is important in a much broader sense: It affects what they get done for the country.
On that front, progress has been slow during the first half-year of this divided government.
Bush and Democratic leaders agreed on new trade-policy guidelines, but Congress later refused to renew his fast-track trade power. Bush vetoed the Democrats' bid to expand stem cell research, a move that Reid and Pelosi called deplorable.
The president's immigration overhaul is dead. A potential energy agreement looks shaky at best. Bush is also in a worsening standoff with Congress over the firing of U.S. attorneys, and a huge fight is brewing over the main spending bills that keep the government in operation.
And, of course, there's the war.
"It's hard to know how they would get along without Iraq," said Charles Jones, who studies relations between Congress and the president as a nonresident senior fellow for The Brookings Institution.
"There are some issues on which they would probably work pretty effectively together, but the overlay of Iraq and the intense conflicts spills over," Jones said. "It makes it difficult for them just to say, 'Well, let's forget Iraq and work nicely on other issues.'"
The White House disputes that spillover, citing quiet negotiations taking place to renew Bush's education law and work with Democrats on the immigration legislation. The immigration bill died when conservatives in Bush's own party rebelled against it.
Iraq may be the better test case of Bush's relationship with Reid and Pelosi.
It took more than three months for Bush and Congress to agree on a war funding bill, gobbling up valuable and finite legislative time.
Bush vetoed the Democrats' first try because it included a timeline for U.S. troop withdrawal. Then came a grim meeting in which Bush, Pelosi and Reid chose negotiators but got little else done.
In the days that followed, Pelosi miffed the White House by holding a vote to pay for the war in stages, drawing another veto threat. Another negotiation session broke down.
Ultimately, hemmed in by time, both sides had to give or risk the political catastrophe of leaving combat troops unfunded.
So Democrats gave up the timeline for withdrawal. Bush agreed to add domestic spending to the bill and establish benchmarks for measuring progress in Iraq.
"The vote showed what's possible when we work together," the president said.
The reality is that the compromise was forced upon them all, because no one wanted to cut off money for the troops.
Still, quietly, some trust built through the experience. Bush's chief of staff, Josh Bolten, appreciated that Reid kept his word during negotiations; Reid respected that no details leaked from those private talks. He now says that Bush is listening more, but only compared with zero cooperation in prior years.
Bush's tendency has never been to engage Congress, said James Thurber, director of the Center for Congressional and Presidential Studies at American University.
"He doesn't have a close relationship with either one of them," Thurber said, referring to Pelosi and Reid. "I think that makes a difference. I don't see any evidence that he has come around to engaging the opposition party the way (Bill) Clinton did."
Bush, Reid and Pelosi all dismiss the idea that they don't like one another despite the constant public harping.
When the cameras are off, the tone is different, said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky, who has sat with Reid and Pelosi in private sessions with Bush.
"It's not an acrimonious kind of thing," McConnell said. "In all the meetings I've been in, there's never been a lack of courtesy. I don't think there's anything personal. We are just in different places. Everybody fully understands that we have different agendas."
Ben Feller covers the White House for The Associated Press.
WASHINGTON (AP) -- When President Bush invited lawmakers for a picnic, an approaching storm threatened to derail the event. His spokesman, Tony Snow, suggested that Democratic leaders in Congress secretly wanted it that way.
"They've been seeding the clouds," he said.
A little joke, a little suspicion. It seemed appropriate for Bush's relationship with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.
In public, there are promises to work together, then unmistakable acrimony. Private dealings are respectful, but not fully trustful.
Where ill will seeps out between Bush and the two Democratic leaders, it is not based on personal animus, those close to them say. Rather, it is rooted in vastly different views of how to run the country, and how much say each side has in running it.
Pelosi and Reid say Bush blithely dismisses their roles as leaders of a coequal branch of government; Bush says they overreach and meddle, never more so than in the case of the war in Iraq.
How well they get along, a fascination in Washington, is important in a much broader sense: It affects what they get done for the country.
On that front, progress has been slow during the first half-year of this divided government.
Bush and Democratic leaders agreed on new trade-policy guidelines, but Congress later refused to renew his fast-track trade power. Bush vetoed the Democrats' bid to expand stem cell research, a move that Reid and Pelosi called deplorable.
The president's immigration overhaul is dead. A potential energy agreement looks shaky at best. Bush is also in a worsening standoff with Congress over the firing of U.S. attorneys, and a huge fight is brewing over the main spending bills that keep the government in operation.
And, of course, there's the war.
"It's hard to know how they would get along without Iraq," said Charles Jones, who studies relations between Congress and the president as a nonresident senior fellow for The Brookings Institution.
"There are some issues on which they would probably work pretty effectively together, but the overlay of Iraq and the intense conflicts spills over," Jones said. "It makes it difficult for them just to say, 'Well, let's forget Iraq and work nicely on other issues.'"
The White House disputes that spillover, citing quiet negotiations taking place to renew Bush's education law and work with Democrats on the immigration legislation. The immigration bill died when conservatives in Bush's own party rebelled against it.
Iraq may be the better test case of Bush's relationship with Reid and Pelosi.
It took more than three months for Bush and Congress to agree on a war funding bill, gobbling up valuable and finite legislative time.
Bush vetoed the Democrats' first try because it included a timeline for U.S. troop withdrawal. Then came a grim meeting in which Bush, Pelosi and Reid chose negotiators but got little else done.
In the days that followed, Pelosi miffed the White House by holding a vote to pay for the war in stages, drawing another veto threat. Another negotiation session broke down.
Ultimately, hemmed in by time, both sides had to give or risk the political catastrophe of leaving combat troops unfunded.
So Democrats gave up the timeline for withdrawal. Bush agreed to add domestic spending to the bill and establish benchmarks for measuring progress in Iraq.
"The vote showed what's possible when we work together," the president said.
The reality is that the compromise was forced upon them all, because no one wanted to cut off money for the troops.
Still, quietly, some trust built through the experience. Bush's chief of staff, Josh Bolten, appreciated that Reid kept his word during negotiations; Reid respected that no details leaked from those private talks. He now says that Bush is listening more, but only compared with zero cooperation in prior years.
Bush's tendency has never been to engage Congress, said James Thurber, director of the Center for Congressional and Presidential Studies at American University.
"He doesn't have a close relationship with either one of them," Thurber said, referring to Pelosi and Reid. "I think that makes a difference. I don't see any evidence that he has come around to engaging the opposition party the way (Bill) Clinton did."
Bush, Reid and Pelosi all dismiss the idea that they don't like one another despite the constant public harping.
When the cameras are off, the tone is different, said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky, who has sat with Reid and Pelosi in private sessions with Bush.
"It's not an acrimonious kind of thing," McConnell said. "In all the meetings I've been in, there's never been a lack of courtesy. I don't think there's anything personal. We are just in different places. Everybody fully understands that we have different agendas."
more...
dreamgc_real
02-01 08:48 AM
F1 - Immigration Wiki (http://immigrationvoice.org/wiki/index.php/F1)
Talk to your guidance counselor, they will be in a better position to provide you with advice.
Talk to your guidance counselor, they will be in a better position to provide you with advice.
hair GOLDEN EAGLE FLYING
kds
01-19 03:09 PM
Hi,
I joined Company A in Oct 2008 and company A applied for my Perm Application in Jul 09. I joined another company in Oct 09 and now i want to join Company A again. can i use the same PERM application or do i need to file a new PERM application. I job description and title is going to be the same. Do i need to transfer my H1B again to Company A. Please help me with these questions.
I joined Company A in Oct 2008 and company A applied for my Perm Application in Jul 09. I joined another company in Oct 09 and now i want to join Company A again. can i use the same PERM application or do i need to file a new PERM application. I job description and title is going to be the same. Do i need to transfer my H1B again to Company A. Please help me with these questions.
more...
lost
09-28 09:24 AM
Visa, immigration laws have grown more complex | courierpostonline.com | Courier-Post (http://www.courierpostonline.com/article/20100928/NEWS05/100928046/Visa-immigration-laws-have-grown-more-complex)
"You're never going to have enough legal immigration slots for everybody who wants to come here," said Ira Mehlman, a spokesman for the Washington-based Federation for American Immigration Reform.
For the legal immigrants who do make it to this country, they are kept in waiting for years together with no sight of relief
The real troublemakers, said ALIPAC's Gheen, are employers who hire illegal immigrants, politicians who praise their contributions and authorities who make them feel welcome by, for example, offering forms and services in Spanish.
This never gets highlighted either by media or public. Many of these employers are big time contributors to the candidates - and candidates turned lawmakers offer their loyal protection! Unless, this changes, the problem cannot be really solved
"You're never going to have enough legal immigration slots for everybody who wants to come here," said Ira Mehlman, a spokesman for the Washington-based Federation for American Immigration Reform.
For the legal immigrants who do make it to this country, they are kept in waiting for years together with no sight of relief
The real troublemakers, said ALIPAC's Gheen, are employers who hire illegal immigrants, politicians who praise their contributions and authorities who make them feel welcome by, for example, offering forms and services in Spanish.
This never gets highlighted either by media or public. Many of these employers are big time contributors to the candidates - and candidates turned lawmakers offer their loyal protection! Unless, this changes, the problem cannot be really solved
hot Eagle Flying above the Nest
tabletpc
08-02 09:14 AM
Can i leave the employer while i-140 is pending.....???If emplyer assures me that he won't revoke the i-140...???
I would like to move to another job at the same time i would like to take some benift(PD) from the GC process i have been through so far.
ANy suggestions are much appreciated...
I would like to move to another job at the same time i would like to take some benift(PD) from the GC process i have been through so far.
ANy suggestions are much appreciated...
more...
house harrassing a Golden Eagle.
Blog Feeds
02-05 06:40 PM
South African-born Dave Matthews, the lead singer of rock band the Dave Matthews Band is having a great year with his most recent album, Big Whiskey and the GrooGrux King nominated this evening for a Grammy for Album of the Year. Matthews gave a great performance at the Haiti telethon last weekend with Neil Young. He's been active in a number of other charities helping farmers, Hurricane Katrina victims and victims of the Virginia Tech shooting (Matthews' hometown is Charlottesville, Virginia). Matthews is also an actor and has been in a number of movies including Because of Winn-Dixie, a favorite...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/01/immigrant-of-the-day-dave-matthews-musician.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/01/immigrant-of-the-day-dave-matthews-musician.html)
tattoo If I were an eagle,I could fly
luncheSpecials
02-19 05:09 PM
I filed 485 last july and want to file EAD now. I had FP done last year. If I do efiling for EAD will I have to go to ASC for photos. I saw in other posts that they have linked Biometrics but what abt the photos ?
Thanks
Thanks
more...
pictures Hawk and a Golden Eagle.
vikrant29nov
03-11 12:42 AM
Please ignore this post.
dresses Eagle Flying With An American
amitga
03-01 10:26 PM
Can somebody share his or her experince of H1B transfer in 7th or more year.
more...
makeup The images of the golden eagle
Blog Feeds
05-26 11:20 AM
The Supreme Court issued its decision in the Arizona business license/e-Verification law of 2007 and by a 5-3 margin has upheld the law. This is the law that allows the state to revoke business licenses for firms knowingly hiring unauthorized workers and also mandating all employers use E-Verify. This was always going to be an easier case for Arizona than the defense of its 2010 law. For one, the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 which created the employer sanctions system, says that while states may not impose civil and criminal penalties on employers hiring unauthorized workers, it does...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2011/05/supreme-court-upholds-state-business-license-e-verify-sanctions-laws.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2011/05/supreme-court-upholds-state-business-license-e-verify-sanctions-laws.html)
girlfriend Golden Eagle flying over Utah backroads
bodhiquest
08-08 02:32 AM
Hello
I am in AOS with priority date of EB2 Dec 2006. We are moving out of USA due to spouse getting a job outside of USA. If we want to retain our priority date and green card, what are we supposed to do before and after we leave USA?
In case we want to make temporary visits to the USA, do we have to apply for visitor visa? I am assuming that we will not have AP since we are not inside USA. Will we even get a visitor/business visa since we have an immigrant visa which is pending with USCIS?
Thanks for your help in advance.
I am in AOS with priority date of EB2 Dec 2006. We are moving out of USA due to spouse getting a job outside of USA. If we want to retain our priority date and green card, what are we supposed to do before and after we leave USA?
In case we want to make temporary visits to the USA, do we have to apply for visitor visa? I am assuming that we will not have AP since we are not inside USA. Will we even get a visitor/business visa since we have an immigrant visa which is pending with USCIS?
Thanks for your help in advance.
hairstyles Golden Eagle Flying Away. I felt bad scaring them away from their meal,
.jpg "Golden Eagle MO (Small).jpg")
maverick_neo
07-20 09:06 PM
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=1&vote=00266
Lets talk about this and try to change the Nay's
Lets talk about this and try to change the Nay's
silvio
03-01 10:11 AM
I had a robbery case in the U.S. in 1995 and was sentenced to 9 years with 85%. Later, I was picked up by immigration and deported for the case in question. While I was in immigration jail I fought my case and won it but immigration appealed it on the first court. I decided to return voluntarily to my country instead of fighting my case over. Now I want to return home in the U.S.. I want to know how do I go about reopening my case.
frostrated
09-01 03:41 PM
Is it having any advantage towards applying I-485 if getting married in US (H1B and other is on F1).
Has no advantage where you get married.
Has no advantage where you get married.
